"The CIT Deception" by brokenstyx

Some guy from here in the UK has made this debunking of CIT. It's a very good analysis of their methods and distortions. He does an amazing job at analysing Roosevelt Roberts' testimony in part 2, and even uses a flight simulator in Part 4 to prove that a north side impact may be possible.











Related Info:

National Geographic, Muse, Internet Censorship, Sibel Edmonds, Invisible Empire, 911-DIS.INFO and the Union of Truthers and Debunkers

Not All Debunking Is Created Equal

Dawn Vignola’s Account vs. CIT’s Methods by Erik Larson

Scootle's CIT Deception Mock Trailer

Debunking the Citizen Investigation Team Hoax

Visibility 9-11 Welcomes 9-11 Researcher Jim Hoffman

Hoax-Promoting Videos

The CIT Virus

CIT Stuff Is Disinfo - Wake Up!

A Clarification on Disinfo

9/11 Researcher Jim Hoffman on Building Collapes

Pentagon Attack Photos

9/11- A Boeing 757 Struck the Pentagon

The Pentagon Attack: What the Physical Evidence Shows

Pentagon Attack & Flight 77 Evidence Summary & Links

Pentagon Eyewitnesses - Analysis of the Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Accounts

CIT WITNESS VERIFICATION, PART 1: THE PREVIOUSLY SUSPICIOUS FATHER MCGRAW REDUX: THE MASTER OPUS

CIT WITNESS VERIFICATION PART II: THE LADIES OF 13th AND POE (summary)

CIT WITNESS VERIFICATION PART III: ROUGHSHOD OVER THE SUSPICIOUS ONES

Google Earth Exposes Pentagon Flyover Farce, or, Critiquing PentaCon (Smoking Crack Version) - Showing the absurdity of The PentaCon's premise

Misinformation: Flight 77 Flight Path Contradicts Official Story according to Black Box Data

9/11 Pentagon Strike Cover up Re-Mastered and Extended

Loose Change Final Cut Part 1

Five Video Frames Leaked in 2002 Show Moments of the Pentagon Attack

What do the frames show about the attack and its investigation or cover-up by authorities? This analysis suggests the answer is not the immediately obvious one.

A field guide to disinformation - mixing truth with lies to distract and discredit