Tuesday, June 29, 2010

David Cameron - Same Old Shit!



Concluding a series of posts on British politics, here's a simple video I put together focusing primarily on David Cameron. It took longer than I would have liked coz I had to keep updating it with new quotes as they came out. For some reason, Youtube has squashed my last three videos and I've had to add "yt:stretch=16:9" to the tags to stretch them. If the video looks kind of pixelated in 360p, watch in 480p or 720p.

Thanks to the Youtube channels itnnews, EUXTV, cveitch and liarpoliticians - virtually all the HQ and HD footage was stolen from those three channels! And thanks aswell to C-Span for their extensive video archive.

Music: Philip Glass - Facades.

My bestie is back in Town


Uwielbiam go. Moje męskie alter ego! Znamy się od ponad dwóch lat. Wiem, że jak zawołam o pomoc, to zrobi wszystko dla mnie! I jeszcze się zapyta, czy mi może jeszcze w innych sprawach pomóc. Wyglądamy jak brat i siostra.
Poza tym mamy do wszystkiego niemalże to samo nastawienie. Jak oglądamy mecz, jesteśmy za tą samą drużyną. Mogłabym wymieniać tak całą noc.

Jest tylko jeden problem, też chce rządzić światem, tak jak ja :)

Live caricaturing – survival techniques for the nervous

Ever had a time when you were so nervous your hands shook? Imagine then having to draw…and not only draw but do it well! That is how I usually feel when doing a live event.

For my first event, I was producing zigzags for straight lines. Even now, I still need to psych myself up before drawing live caricatures.

Here’s how I prepare myself, beforehand.

  1. Practice drawing caricatures -using photographs for reference. I concentrate on one feature repetitively e.g. eyes, noses or mouths
  2. Gather together equipment – pads of paper, pencils, rubber, drawing board etc
  3. Practice quick drawings using images from magazines.  I use these to experiment.Marilyn 005Like with Marilyn here. I thought I’d play with the lips, not sure it really works. The “doe caught in headlights” look is accurate and I’m loving the body! 
  4. Practice some more. ( Do you see a theme emerging here?)
  5. Practice drawing real people by press ganging family members.  It’s usually accompanied by phrases such as “Go away, I don’t want to be drawn!” “ Pleeeeeese leave me alone!”… @@@@@@@@ (This stage doesn’t tend to go too well as my family are wise to all my strategies!!- NB Must devise some more cunning plans!)
  6. Practice some more. Here I might concentrate on body positions. It’s a good idea to have a stock of poses that you can draw comfortably. You know, like a ballerina, footballer, artist, musician,… I could go on!
  7. Go into blind panic that I’m never going to be ready and it will all turn out to be a disaster!
  8. Practice yet again…
  9. Concentrate on practicing 5 minute sketching with marker pens!
  10. Check my equipment and pack up the car.
  11. Pray!!! Maybe I should do that earlier in future?

On the day I aim to

  1. Arrive early and get set up.
  2. Think positive. i.e. keep telling yourself you’ll do well not I’m going to get the noses wrong!
  3. Try to make the sitter at ease when I’m actually doing a caricature. It usually that helps steady my nerves! Usually I’m fine once I’ve started drawing.

So, what do I do after the event?

  1. Pack everything away
  2. Collapse on the sofa with a bottle of wine vowing NEVER EVER to do THAT again!

Do you have any suggestions for remaining calm before a live event?

Monday, June 28, 2010

Debunking Joseph Nobles: Freefall Speed

This is a response to the AE911Truth.Info page titled "Freefall Speed." Here, I will examine the arguments made by Joseph Nobles and see if they are justifiable.

The Difference Between "Speed" and "Acceleration"

The first point Mr. Nobles makes is one I happen to agree with. It is clearly more appropriate to say "acceleration" rather than "speed" when discussing the issue of free fall. However, I have often felt that trying to determine if the WTC fell at free fall acceleration is in itself somewhat misleading. If we are trying to establish whether or not the buildings were controlled demolitions, then the question really should not be "did the buildings fall at free fall?" The question should be "did the buildings fall in time intervals consistent with controlled demolitions?" That of course begs the question of whether or not buildings destroyed through controlled demolition fall in free fall. More on this will be discussed below.

Rate of Collapses

Mr. Nobles features this photo to demonstrate how the debris coming off from the Towers is falling faster than the Towers themselves.

While the debris is certainly falling faster than the actual collapse, the wave of the destruction appears to be keeping up with the majority of the debris. David Chandler has outlined this characteristic of the collapses very accurately.




What's more, the rate of fall for some of the pieces of steel has itself been shown to be a smoking gun.

It has already been established that the total time for the Towers to come down was approximately 15 seconds in either case.

Mr. Nobles then presents this video to demonstrate that Building 7 actually took close to 16 seconds to collapse.



This is an issue that has been addressed several times already, but many debunkers still think the fall of the east penthouse invalidates the idea that WTC 7 was a demolition. I myself have already shown the collapse of column 79 and the penthouse is problematic enough. And it is not impossible that roof elements can collapse in a demolition before the main structure.



Sure, there was a much shorter gap between the two events than with Building 7. But clearly the idea of sections of the roof falling in a demolition before the main structure is not unheard of.



Oddly, Mr. Nobles refers to the main structure of WTC 7 as a "portion" of the collapse. That makes it sound like it was a very small part of the building that collapsed. The east penthouse could be more accurately described as a "portion."

Measurements of the Fall Rates

Mr. Nobles attempts to demonstrate that the rate at which the buildings fell has already been well accounted for by several sources.
He first cites a statement made in NIST's FAQ on the WTC, ignoring the fact that nowhere in NIST's report do they explain the actual total collapse of the buildings.
As 911research.wtc7.net points out:

NIST's assertion that the Tower's intact structure was "unable to stop or even to slow the falling mass" is absurd:

-It requires us to believe that the massive steel frames of the towers provided no more resistance to falling rubble than air.
-It ignores the fact that most of the rubble fell outside the towers' footprints, and hence could not contribute to crushing.
-It is unsupported by any calculation or logical argument.


Mr. Nobles then cites the work of Bazant et al. He refers to Bazant's work as providing "more rigorous calculations" and that his papers have been published in "respected scientific journals." However, several refutations to Bazant's work have been written over the years. Two refutations have even been peer reviewed and published in the same journal Bazant's papers have been published in. Those can be viewed here and here.

Although Mr. Nobles portrays NIST and Bazant as having explained that "the acceleration of their descent was not mathematically unusual," there are phenomenons in the collapses of both buildings that neither NIST nor Bazant account for.
One of which is the instant acceleration of the upper section of WTC 1. Debunkers have yet to provide any rational explanation for this event.
Another phenomenon is the disintegration of the upper section of WTC 2 as it collapsed. 911research points out that:

"It is clear that that the top section itself must be disintegrating. Otherwise the top section would have extended far into parts of the building that are clearly as yet unaffected by the collapse."

And video evidence confirms this.

Mr. Nobles makes some mention of the fact that portions of the cores of both Towers remained standing after the collapses. However, video evidence shows that the remaining core of the South Tower included neither north nor west columns.



And there was hardly anything left of the North Tower's core.



Despite Mr. Nobles' claims to the contrary, the rate at which the Towers fell is greatly at issue.

The Fall of WTC 7

Mr. Nobles lastly attempts to refute many arguments made about the collapse of WTC 7. Mr. Nobles believes that the main structure of WTC 7 also did not fall in 6.5 seconds. He features this diagram to illustrate this point.

I've never particularly liked using pictures to track the fall of any of the buildings. I feel that the videos speak for themselves.




Mr. Nobles makes quite a remarkable statement in regard to the collapse of the building.

"As shocking as it may be to our inexperience in large buildings falling, this is how quickly buildings of this size fall when they begin to collapse."

Oh really? If that's the case Mr. Nobles, then why did these buildings, all known controlled demolitions, take as long and even longer to fall than Building 7? Considering the fact that all these buildings are shorter than Building 7 and supposedly fire, not explosives, brought Building 7 down.



Controlled demolition clearly doesn't always cause a building to fall at free fall.

Finally, Mr. Nobles attempts to explain the period of free fall Building 7 underwent in its collapse. And like all other debunkers, he attributes this to the alleged buckling of eight of the lower floors. I recently demonstrated in two previous posts that these claims are clearly unfounded.

Conclusions

Mr. Nobles has clearly not explained the collapse anomalies of the Twin Towers and Building 7. Nothing will ever accurately explain what happened to those buildings until a new investigation is finally launched. One thing is for sure though: fire cannot cause a steel framed building to fall at the incredible rate at which the WTC fell in. The only example of a top-down progressive collapse initiated by fire is one in which a 13 story building took 10 seconds to partially collapse.

Ich liebe dieses Leben


In this very moment I would love to write an Ode to life. An Ode to my life as it is. Unfortunately my vocabulary is unsufficient to do so. I do not find the suitable and sophisticated words for this celebration of beauty , happiness and goodness.

I am so happy to have met all those people lately. Most of all for the chance we have been given.
And I must admitt, and I am really happy to do so, I will leave this city with one crying and one smiling eye. Can't be any better.


And I am most of all glad to have dumped that asshole !



Barcelona

Click here to view these pictures larger

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Italy Top 150



It wasn't easy, but Nick and I managed to put together our top 150 favorite pictures from Italy.  This was no easy task as we took over 1,300!  

Hope you enjoy and let us know if you have a favorite. 

Everyone Needs an Alice

In college when most people are relieved to be free from mandatory Saturday chores and dish duty I became extremely neurotic about keeping a tidy apartment.  I quickly was give the nickname Monica (aka from friends), as I would police the roommates on cleaning our apartment.  Emily and Tiara recently reminded me of the time we had a huge party at our apartment and when someone spilled a beer, I was quickly at their feet with Resolve blotting out the stain! 

Although I have become a little more relaxed about cleaning,who wouldn't want someone like Alice Turner living with you full time taking care of the everyday mundane tasks. Unfortunately for me and you we don't have an Alice living with us 24 -7, but we can make doing daily chores significantly more fun with the help of Alice Supply co. Named after the famous Brady Bunch housekeeper, Alice Supply has taken the common broom, dustpan, plunger and toolbox and gave them a whimsical makeover.

Although I wouldn't normally suggest  giving cleaning supplies as a gift, I think these items are so fun it could make a great housewarming present or bridal shower gift.  I especially love the 10 quart metal bucket.  This could be used for washing the car or as my husband suggested chilling beers.....

Clearly my husband and I have different thoughts on housecleaning. 

To find your local Alice retailer visit:  http://www.alicesupplyco.com/retailers.php



Saturday, June 26, 2010

Good Science and Demolition Theories, Indeed

Mike King's May 13, 2007 article "Good Science and Demolition Theories" purports to demonstrate that conflating these terms regarding the WTC buildings on September 11th 2001 is a tenuous exercise.

King states:

There is... a crucial paper by Brent Blanchard on the Implosion World website at: http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf. This paper alone should end any credulity towards the demolition theory, though its points need more elaboration for a non-technical audience. The reason that I highlight this paper is because it is the only one to date written by an authority on controlled demolition, based on access to data not available to either the official account or the counter-orthodoxy.
Well Mr. King, on Thursday (6/25/10) Tom Sullivan, a former explosive-charge placement technician, went public on the other side of this issue. Sullivan left the industry in the wake of the 9/11 attacks after it found itself in a steep decline due to a public weary of explosions and falling buildings. But his former employer Controlled Demolition, Inc. has boasted to have imploded "more buildings, chimneys, towers, bridges, and other structures" than the sum total of its competitors.

Sullivan personally placed hundreds of explosive charges at the Kingdome in Seattle Washington, which set a world record for the largest structure implosion by volume.

Photobucket

In the article "Explosive Evidence at WTC Cited by Former CDI Employee," it is written:

Before he became connected to CDI, was an independent photographer during his early years in Maryland. He would be sent to CD sites and take still pictures of the jobs...

When asked, what made CDI the best in the business, he commented, 'their family had all the experience because they 'invented' the art of CD. They spent years traveling around the world, showing and educating people how this art form works.'...

Brent Blanchard, the photographer from the controlled demolition company Protec, has said, in criticism of the CD theory, that there would have had to been detonation cords strung all over the place and casings left in the rubble pile from the cutter charges. So we asked for a response from Sullivan. He noted that:

Remote wireless detonators have been available for years. Look at any action movie --and of course the military has them. The reason most contractors don’t use them is that they are too expensive -- but in a project with a huge budget it would be no problem. As for the casings -- everyone in the industry, including Blanchard, would know that RDX explosive cutter charges are completely consumed when they go off -- nothing is left. And in the case of Thermite cutter charges, that may also be the case. Thermite self-consuming cutter charge casings have been around since first patented back in 1984.
This type of demolition technology has long been cited by the 9/11 truth movement, and Blanchard's paper was previously debunked by Jim Hoffman of 911research.wtc7.net in his essay "Reply to Protec's - A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE COLLAPSE OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2 & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION INDUSTRY VIEWPOINT."

But since no demolition experts echoed these points we were being "credulous." So, what do the "debunkers" have to say now that this is not the case?

Commenter "TV" at the Screw Loose Change blog notes that the device patented in 1984 had "low gas output," but since then thermite technology has vastly improved.

Commenter Dave Kyte states, "You would think they could find a real controlled demolition expert of some talent and expertise. What ever happened to Danny Jowenko? Wasn't he going to blow the lid off the case? Oh. Wait, he says the towers fell from fire. Never mind. So now Sullivan is not a "real controlled demolition expert," but Blanchard is, that's rich.

It's just like when "debunkers" poo-pooed our arguments on the basis that "no engineers agreed with us," and then employed the logical fallacy of moving the goalposts after we garnered the support of 1,000 architectural and engineering professionals, including many structural and aerospace engineers. The goal line is again moving just out of reach as more and more people with demolition expertise are questioning 9/11.

As I have stated on this blog before:

Jowenko does not think the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition due to their unconventional nature, but as the website 911review.com has pointed out, "A demolition that is planned as part of a covert operation to fit a narrative of events that attributes the total destruction of the building to a different cause (such as a jetliner crash and consequent fires) has a very different set of requirements than a demolition that is planned to legally remove a building in an urban setting."
And despite claims to the contrary, he is quite sure WTC 7 was a demolition. Perhaps the more conventional nature of WTC 7's demolition can be explained by evidence that indicates 10:45 a.m. was the originally planned demolition time.

Similarly, 911blogger.com user "stallion4" noted:

The towers weren't conventional demolitions. They were "top down" demolitions, which are rare in the professional demolition industry.

This was achieved by strategically planting and detonating explosives beneath each tower's predetermined impact zone. This was done to create the illusion that airliner impacts caused the towers to fall.

Building 7 was a classic demolition job -- bottom up -- the type of demolition that Danny Jowenko is qualified to give his professional opinion on.

This is also akin to the fact we were told for years that we had to have peer-reviewed evidence to be taken seriously, but now that we have presented peer-reviewed evidence, it's still not good enough:


http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/04/nanothermite-debunking-rebuttal-deroy.html

Another commenter at Screw Loose Change states that even wireless detonation systems require det cord. Be this as it may, it does decrease the amount of overall cord needed. As Robert Erickson, producer of the last year's National Geographic hit piece on 9/11 truth stated in an email, "I asked demolition experts about setting off charges with radio signals. They said it was very feasible. Everyone seems to agree to the viability of radio signals setting off explosives. That would eliminate some of the primer cord."

This fact, in conjunction with the highly tailorable type of explosives that the evidence indicates were used would eliminate the need for any cord:


http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/blasting_scenario.html

Sullivan states, "Fire cannot bring down steel-framed high rises -- period."

I know a demolition company that disagrees!

Photobucket
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/09/my-demolition-company-update.html

Sullivan's revelations come at the heels of, and add credence to, reports that respected Middle East expert and former BBC presenter Alan Hart was personally told by the most prominent civil engineering company in the world that the collapse of the Twin Towers was a controlled demolition.

But it doesn't take an expert to see that the WTC buildings show every characteristic of controlled demolition.



But the statements of DEMOLITION EXPERT Tom Sullivan might help others to see through their cognitive dissonance to the obvious truth:





Related Info:

A Firefighter, A Demolition Expert, and an Architect Look at Ground-Zero

Interview with Tom Sullivan, Richard Gage an Eric Lawyer:

Guns and Butter - April 28, 2010 at 1:00pm

Click to listen (or download)

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/60621

"I retired from FDNY in 1998. I knew many of the guys who died in the WTC collapses. May they rest in peace. I've read tons of information re. the deaths of my brothers on 9/11. I've watched the videos, listened to the rantings on both sides. It wasn't until 2006 that I began questioning the "official story" and did my own research. There is bad info on both sides, but I've concluded that the 'official story' doesn't add up. It sounds like a whitewash. The 9/11 Commission didn't investigate anything--they just took statements. We need a real, independent investigation, with supeona powers. If the 'offical' version is correct, so be it. And if heads are going to roll at any level of the government or military, so be it. Let's do it, and let's not be afraid of the truth. The brothers deserve that much." - Bryan Hunt, FireFightersFor911Truth.org

GET INVOLVED! CHANNEL YOUR VOICE! http://nyccan.org/join.php

Oh, How Typical ! Arch Debunker Pat Curley Grossly Misrepresents Firefighter Testimony and then Wrongly Accuses 911 Truthers of the Same Thing Really?

Explosive Evidence at WTC Cited by Former CDI Employee 24 June 2010 Written by Darcy Wearing and Richard Gage, AIA

Casomai

Casomai... casomai ti amero. Casomai me amerai.
Casomai saremo insieme.

Casomai.

Friday, June 25, 2010

The poor needs help ,
Not sympathy .

- Mother Teresa



******************



Saturday


Greetings , my fellow earthlings !

It's the 26th of June , which means the month of June is about to go by and here comes July ! Oh, how time flies so very fast as I can still remember the day I first stepped into Form 4 .

The smells , the sights and of course the sounds . Ah , everything was just so brand new . I felt like I was given another chance to start a new life . Until he came along ..

But who knew ? That after spending 6 months sitting in class torturing the teachers giving them a run for their money's worth would go by so fast . It's as if what they say about time and tide waits for no man really does prove to be correct .





Sunday

On the 27th June ( Sunday ) , I tagged along with my sister and her office companions for a game of paintball . Yes , the game where our strength , courage , intelligence and teamwork are put to the test as you fire round after round of tiny balls filled with paint .

The venue was somewhere near Batu Caves , but further up a little . It was a jungle terrain , something different than the one at Pyramid . It really was an impressive set-up as our battleground really gave us the feeling of being in the army , during the Vietnam War .

There were bunkers made fallen trees , wooden planks and doors for cover and of course , trees all around us providing sufficient shield and cover as the enemy rains terror upon you .

Of course , the very obvious , each game consists of two teams to which my team was named " Hardware " , and the others were " Seafood " and " Software " . So these are the names auditors of the famed company KPMG are very fond of .

There were 27 people and we were split into three teams , each taking turns after one game and another . Hardware and Software ended in a draw where else team Seafood ended victorious . I guess you can't really mess with seafood after all ?

Anyways . Being hit with a paintball even from afar range really does hurt . It's like a bird with sharp beaks banging onto parts of your body , some say that it feels like being whipped by Pn Teo using a cane . But it definitely does leave a mark on your body , a sound reminder of what people would do to get a little bit of excitement .

I owned a total of 12 people in 3 games . The first game , we lost as we were bombarded with shots from the opposing team . The second round was a draw as either teams could make it to the other camp to capture the flag .

But one thing is for sure . During the 3rd round of the second terrain ( yes , there were two types of terrains . One feels like a normal uphill combat where the other feels like fighting against the Japanese as there were lots of hidden trails and bamboo shoots that protects you most of the time from vicious shots ) , I owned three ' kamikaze ' enemies who decided to run for it to capture our flag . As they approached the flagsite , I owned all three of them by releasing a relentless amount of paintballs onto their vests which by the way , each costs RM 95 . Luckily , being the youngest in the family I have leverage . Therefore , my sister was given the honor of paying the RM 95 for me :D

Oddly enough , some of my sister's collegues were very familiar to me , it's as if I've met them somewhere before . So , it wasn't hard for me to fit in as they feel the same about me as well . Although , their discussions on tax and job problems wasn't really my cup of tea .



But in the end , as one person enjoys something , he ends up screwing something else in return . Sometimes , I wonder if it was worth it going paintball-ing that day ..




P/s : Sorry , didn't had the time to take pictures during battle . Had the time to sms Aaron though . You see , I was the sniper at that time ..



*****************



Wimbledon 2o10


After an easy win against Arnaud Clement by a impressive 6-2 , 6-4 , 6-2 , Swiss maestro Roger Federer seemed to have found his rhythm back on track .

But what lies ahead of him is nothing but the true test as he faces either Djokovic of Serbia or Hewitt of Australia . Both players to which I might add , could prove to be the key obstacle in what many hopes for of a Federer-Nadal final .

Last year , Nadal could not defend his title as Wimbledon champ as he was affected with knee injury , which made him lose to Robin Soderling in the French Open as well . But this year , Nadal plays incredibly and is prepared to face anyone in order to be crowned Wimbledon champion again . Although , he recently admitted that his knees were somehow affecting him again .

But with Federer pumped up after his previous game , I pretty much think the thought of how important Wmbledon to him has set into his mind .

Roger Federer has advanced to the 4th round of Wimbledon 2010 where he will face Jurgen Melzer . The victory over Clement was quite solid although Federer's draw to the round of 16 has lacked a good player as ' soon to be out of the top 50 ' Tommy Robredo was the only other seed in that section of the draw .

Melzer is playing the best tennis of his career but this will be the first time he's ever played a Wimbledon 4th round match and that strongly implies that he ought to be easy pickings for Federer , who has made 7 consecutive finals at the All England Club .




Great to be back on rhythm



******************



Ever wondered what did famous celebrities say just right before they die ?

Well , here is some of the the most famous people of all time and here's what they said ..

Let's start off with ..








Elvis Presley
Last words
:
I hope I haven't bored you , "
( ending his last press conference) .






Bob Marley
Last words :

" Money can't buy life ."
( to one of his sons )









Barry White
Last words
:
" Leave me alone . I'm fine . "







Al Capone
Last words :

" You can get more with a kind word and a gun
than you can get with a kind word alone . "







Abraham Lincoln
Last words
:
" They won't think anything about it , "
( after Mary Todd Lincoln asked him what the patrons of
Ford's Theater might think of two old people holding hands )








John Lennon
Last words :

" Yes , I am , "
( while sitting in a police car on the way to a hospital , after officers
asked him if he were John Lennon )







Robert F Kennedy
Last words :

" Is everyone else all right ? "
( whispered to his wife ) .







John F Kennedy
Last words
:
"If someone is going to kill me , they will kill me , "
( on arriving in Dallas in 1963 ) .








Joe DiMaggio
Last words :
" I finally get to see Marilyn "
( referring to his ex-wife )







Frank Sinatra
Last words
:
" I'm losing . "








Pope John Paul II
Last words :

" Amen "








Pablo Picasso
Last words
:
" Drink to me! "
Other reports say " Drink to me . Drink to my health .
You know I can't drink any more . "







Mother Teresa
Last words :

" Jesus , I love you . Jesus , I love you . "








Martin Luther King Jr.
Last words:

" Make sure you play ' Take My Hand , Precious Lord . '
Play it real pretty , "








Marilyn Monroe
Last words
:
" Say goodbye to Pat , say goodbye to Jack and say goodbye to yourself ,
because you're a nice guy . "








Sir Winston Churchill
Last words :

" I'm bored with it all "







Saddam Hussein
Last words :

" I swear there is no God but Allah and Muhammad . . . "









Princess Diana Spencer
Last words :

" My God . What's happened ? "








Alex the African Grey Parrot
Last words :

" You be good . See you tomorrow . I love you . "





The parrot never got the chance to see tomorrow ..



************



Okay , my post ends here .

I'll see you guys some other time . Hope you've enjoyed this .

By the way , whose going to watch Twilight , Eclipse ? (:





- Jaden -

team englend wallpaper world cup 2010 - Gol -

world cup,world cup 2010, South Africa, football, soccer, team englend wallpaper world cup 2010 - Gol -
team englend wallpaper world cup 2010 - Gol -

team englend wallpaper world cup 2010 - Gol -

world cup,world cup 2010, South Africa, football, soccer, team englend wallpaper world cup 2010 - Gol -
team englend wallpaper world cup 2010 - Gol -

Per questo ho bisogno di...

I hate and adore him.

I am in need of a new order.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

More exploded bone fragments found...

More 9/11 Human Remains Found At Ground Zero
ABC News

Just two or so dump trucks filled with never-before sifted debris from Ground Zero have yielded 72 new fragments of human remains in an almost three-month operation that could bring closure to more families of victims of the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center terror attack.

Because of the size and condition of some of the remains the NYC Medical Examiner's office told ABC News there was a good chance of obtaining DNA samples that could lead to new IDs once DNA testing is completed. The remains of about 1,000 victims of the almost 3,000 killed at Ground Zero have still not been identified.

A memorandum summarizing the findings of the operation, in which 844 cubic yards of debris was forensically sifted, was released by New York City officials Tuesday. It stated that including the 72 new fragments, a total of 1845 potential human remains have now been located since 2006 and are at the Medical Examiner's Office and when possible will be subjected to DNA testing.

The full report summarizing the now completed sifting operation is expected--nearly 9 years after al Qaeda crashed planes into the Twin Towers --to yield clues to the identities of some of the victims whose remains were either never found or are not as yet identifiable.

The sifting operation took place at Fresh Kill Landfills in Staten Island, where the new debris was brought and run through a series of conveyor belts that sort debris by size. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, the debris from the site yielded driver's licenses, rings, watches, wallets, shoes -- boxes and boxes of poignant reminders of the cost in human lives. This time, the sorting yielded bone fragments.

As of January 2010, the Medical Examiner's office had identified 1626 Ground Zero victims, or 59 percent of a reported 2,752 total. As of that date 21,744 remains had been recovered and 12,768, or 59 percent, had been identified.

Related Info:

1000 Missing Bodies

So Falling Buildings Vaporize People?

911research.wtc7.net

The massive operation to clean up Ground Zero was described as a rescue operation for weeks, as if anyone could have survived an event that turned all the buildings' concrete to dust. The event didn't spare the corpses either, as they were vaporized, according to the coroner.

"Three months after the Sept. 11 attacks, World Trade Center victims' families are being forced to face the ghastly possibility that many of the dead were 'vaporized,' as the medical examiner put it, and may never be identified."

The fires were limited to small parts of the buildings. How did the collapse of the buildings vaporize thousands of bodies? It takes exposure of a body to 1400-1800 degrees F for at least two hours to cremate a body. 1

An entire year after the attack, the medical examiner had identified only half of the victims, despite a well-funded forensic effort using the most advanced DNA identification techniques. 19,906 remains were recovered from Ground Zero. 4,735 of those have been identified. Up to 200 remains have been linked to a single person. Of the 1,401 people identified, 673 of the IDs were based on DNA alone. Only 293 intact bodies were found. 2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References

1. Cremation FAQ, [cached]
2. More than half of victims IDd, nydailynews.com, 9/11/02 [cached]

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Don't be a Slacktivist! [Updated]

Pat Curley of the Screw Loose Change blog writes today:

133... That's how many people sent in letters/faxes to the NYC District Attorney requesting an investigation of WTC-7, per the request from NYC-CAN. One hundred and thirty-three. I mean, let's put that in perspective. NYC-CAN claimed to have gathered 30,000 or so signatures for their ballot initiative, right? Not really quite enough to qualify for the ballot, but close.

This is 1/226th of that. And it gets worse, much worse, because that's an unfair comparison; nothing in the NYC-CAN current push says you have to live in the Big Apple.

Following on the heels of last week's idiotic attempt to get the DA to look at some videos of WTC-7's collapse, this week the Troofers are highlighting the supposed "countdowns" and "foreknowledge" as lines of investigation, featuring, no kidding, Kevin McPadden and Indira Singh.
First off Pat, it was not 30,000 signatures they gathered, it was 80,000, so no, you are not right.



So, NYC CAN was much more successful than Pat states and by his own admission should have had their initiative on the ballot. They've had weekly campaigns focused on raising awareness of WTC 7 since back in March, so it would not be surprising if the numbers have lessened, but there is no doubt that the total letters sent number in the thousands.

Here is a fax that I sent back in March to a few of the NYC Council members which destroys "debunker" talking points about Building 7. Here is an easy site from which to send free faxes. And here is a recent blog I did debunking Pat on the issue of WTC 7 foreknowledge.

The fact of the matter is, poll numbers indicate that 100 million Americans question the official 9/11 story, sometimes it's just a matter of getting people motivated. So, are we gonna let the "debunkers" get away with this!? Don't engage in slacktivism!

CHANNEL YOUR VOICE!

Update 6/15/10:

Fellow Advocates,

Thank you and congratulations! Together we finished Week 2 with 217 letters sent to the District Attorney's office.

In Week 3 let's make it our minimum goal to reach 500 letters, and in Week 4, 1000 letters! How do we do it?

If you haven't sent a letter yet, now is the time to join. You've never had an easier opportunity to take action and be heard. If you have been participating - in addition to sending your letter for Week 3 - make it your personal to goal to get just one friend to send a letter by forwarding this action alert and urging them to take action. There must be one person you can get to send a letter with you. If you can get that one person to send a letter, we will reach 500 letters this week and 1000 next week!

To help you get more people in your networks involved, the instructions have been refined, the action alert and letter are now posted on NYC CAN's Channel Your Voice page (the link is http://nyccan.org/join.php), and a Word file has been posted there for download/print.

Let's do our best to reach 500 letters this week and 1000 letters next week. The DA's office is listening!

Sincerely,

Ted Walter

Update 6/23/10:

Fellow Advocates!

Together we finished Week 3 with 221 letters sent to the District Attorney's office! It may not be 1000, but it's downright amazing when you think about the message 221 letters must send to the folks in the Special Prosecutions Bureau. 221 letters this week, on top of 217 letters last week, on top of 133 letters the week before. Wow!

The letter for Week 4 is our most important and most powerful one yet. Read it, and you'll agree. If there's one route the DA will most likely take to revealing the truth about September 11, 2001, it's the destruction of physical evidence at the WTC site.

Now is the time to take action if you haven't yet! Don't have a fax machine, an envelope or a stamp? NO PROBLEM! Go to FaxZero.com and send a fax for free by uploading your letter. The letter is only three pages so you can fax it for free!

And, in case it was unclear before, no matter where you live you can send a letter!

Thank you for never giving up hope.

Sincerely,

Ted Walter

Update 8/11/2010:

Fellow Advocates,

Thank you for all your hard work, and congratulations on a job well done! We finished Week 4 of "Wake up the DA" with 408 letters sent, bringing our grand total above 1,000 letters. Now that so many seeds have been planted with the City Council and DA - and NYC CAN continues to water them - it's time to shift our collective focus to creating the kind of political climate where those seeds can grow. Let's start with a major public awareness campaign, which we are proud to be joining several other leaders and organizations in supporting. Here it is.

Very Truly Yours,

Ted Walter

Related Info:

New Action Page at "BuildingWhat?"

NYC CAN, AE911Truth ask NYC city council to investigate WTC Building 7

Thank You Mr Curley: "Debunker" PROMOTES the "Building What?" Campaign & Pushes Discredited Material (again) to Discredit Himself.

Building What? is up...

Distorted Tilt Confirmed

To explain the constant acceleration of the upper block of WTC 1, Ryan Mackey insists that the initial tilt of the Tower misaligned the columns to a point where the impacts were not square enough to produce sufficient deceleration. He demonstrated this in a Hardfire debate with Tony Szamboti, using this graphic.

However, Scootle Royale demonstrated that Mackey was incorrect in his analysis, pointing out that the upper block did not rotate about a fixed point as Mackey's slide states. Here, I will expand on Scootle's rebutal to Mackey by using another debunker's analysis. Shortly after the Hardfire debate aired, debunker AlienEntity posted the following video in support of Mackey's theory.



The video basically confirms that the tilt was instant in the collapse. But after I watched it a few times, I realized that it may also confirm exactly what Scootle pointed out. To test this, I first took Mackey's original graphic and straightened it out to illustrate the Tower prior to tilting. Then, I set it next to Mackey's graphic of the tilted Tower with markers added.

I've numbered the floors for both graphics so that debunkers will not accuse me of incorrectly adjusting Mackey's original graphic.

What this comparison shows is that, if the upper block truly "rotated before falling" as Mackey's slide states, then the north side of the Tower would have remained fixed relative to the original height of the building. Here, I've taken AlienEntity's original video and added my own marker to the roofline of the building. And it clearly shows that the north side does not remain fixed. It falls at the same time the tilt begins.



Mackey's analysis is clearly incorrect, and does not adequately explain the lack of a jolt in the North Tower's collapse. Until proven otherwise, the acceleration of WTC 1 clearly violates the laws of physics.

Side note: I would like to take this opportunity to thank AlienEntity, as his work has been very useful to me recently.

Because it can Never be Repeated Enough: 9/11 Experiments: Collapse vs. Demolition

Any theory that does not match experiment is wrong. It doesn't matter what the computer models predict, how much funding is behind it, what the experts say, or what everyone "thinks". Nothing can fool the laws of physics.




http://www.sott.net/articles/show/210712-Because-it-can-never-be-repeated-enough-9-11-Experiments-Collapse-vs-Demolition

Remember: only the truth about 911 will stop the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Related Info:

The Conservation Of Angular Momentum In Action...

Distorted Tilt Confirmed

Debunker Verinage Fantasies are Bunk!

The Physics of WTC 7

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

C'e una cosa molto interessantissima!

Here is a link to a very good blog post of my dear friend. It's in Polish only, concerning the latest policy in my beautiful country!


Wklejam linka do wpisu mojej kochanej Iskierki. Warto zajrzeć!
“ There are four questions of value in life ...
What is sacred ? Of what is the spirit made ? What is worth living for , and what is worth dying for ?
The answer to each is the same . Only love .”


- Johnny Depp




***************



Greetings to all of you .

In case some of you are still in dream-mode , the month of June is about to come to an end . And come to think of it , my SPM examinations are just around the corner .

And are the students is my class doing anything about it ?

I doubt so . There are constant bullying in class and the bullying does not limit itself towards students only , but teachers as well . But what can I say ? This class is uncontrollable and yet at the same time , very entertaining .

Anyways . I've just got back some of my mid-year test papers to which either I obtained A's for the papers , or I've failed them . However , it has come to my attention that there is ONE person I know who is glad enough that he has better marks in History than me . Well , let's not point fingers to anyone . (:

I sometimes wonder what's the point of these continuous examinations that are held all year round till' you're finally old enough to drive and hit an old lady with your car . To me , it's pointless .

But I guess that the government's move on abolishing UPSR and PMR proves that they wonder the same thing as I do . Let's just hope that they continue with this plan , otherwise there's gonna be hell to pay .





Speaking of hell , the weather these days suddenly doesn't feel like being in hell anymore . It's more , gentle in a way .

I know , I know .. I've been complaining about how hot and humid the weather has been but for now , I can't seem to do so . Well , that's because it's not hot anymore . These days , we have experienced cool mornings and normal afternoons . And when I say normal , I meant normal , normal . Not as in the super-hot afternoons where you take a step outside of your house and you sweat ridiculously like a pig .

Deep down , I do realize that these changes which seem very strange are aftermaths of drastic weather or conditions that have changed in other parts of the world . And to my surprise , I was right .

Not only in Singapore , but China as well are facing floods that have consumed the lives of many . Well , one man's poison is another man's meat , I guess . Perhaps we should just enjoy the weather while we still can . I know I am .

Because every morning , it feels like being at Fraser's Hill once again . Cool and calm . Okay , maybe not so calm . There is no such thing as ' calm ' if one studies in my class .



*************




Wimbledon 2010



On Monday , Wimbledon 2010 kicked start with a scare for world number two , Roger Federer as he nearly eliminated at his first Wimbledon match this year . Allejandro Falla of Columbia took Federer on a frightening ride as Falla took hold of the first two sets , sighting the end of Federer's quest to clinch a 6th Wimbledon title .

Beginning the match with Federer's attempt to serve and volley but to no avail . And it seems that every time the Swiss maestro attempted to perform a winning strike , Falla was there to counter the Swiss . Looking like he was about to die , Federer struggled throughout the first two sets looking for his timing and service .





Stressed .



But during the third set , Federer showed some improvement compared to the previous two sets where his backhands are always amiss . But during the third set where fear starts to creep into Falla's mind of winning , Federer broke Falla's service to clinch the third set .

During the fourth set , the Swiss ace attempted to push and pressurize Falla , which brought the game to a tie-breaker . Unforced errors from Falla gave Federer the lead in the tie-break to which the Swiss took hold of . And finally during the fifth set , due to exhaustion and muscle cramps on his legs , Federer took advantage of Falla and demolished the Colombian with full-class and luxurious hair by a 6-0 .

Roger Federer indeed proved once again why he is in fact , King of Grass . The game ended in favor of the Swiss by a frightening 5-7 , 4-6 , 6-4 , 7-6 , 6-0 .




And due to Federer's poor display , he has been asked to swallow a dose of humility after being shunted off Centre Court .

The Swiss , who has ruled the legendary court during a period of Wimbledon domination, will follow his Scottish rival to Court No 1 for his second-round match this evening .

Now , Federer awaits his next opponent Illia Bozaljac .





**************



Monty Python . One of the best comedic series ever made .

And now , I'm about to introduce to you one of the funniest scenes ever in history of history .

The beginning part might come to you as odd , but bear the cartoon dragon and finish up the video . The fun begins when they start to answer questions ..

Turn up the volume as you need to listen to what they say .

Enjoy .










" What do you mean ? An African swallow or an European swallow ? "



**************



Okay , I think that's enough for now .

I'll try my best to update again next week , God willing .

And for God's sake David , please stop bugging me to update my blog so very often . I simply do not have that much time to do so .




- Jaden -